Wendy’s LA4HIRE: What Every Screenwriter Can Learn From Alfred Hitchcock – Part II

It wasn’t until I took a course at Columbia University in New York City on “The Language of Film” that I truly began to appreciate Hitchcock’s genius. So even if the psychological thriller or horror film are not your genre and you are writing romantic comedies, bromance films, sci-fi action or fantasy — every screenwriter can learn and benefit from his techniques and philosophies when it comes to elevating tension and stakes.

THE BIRDS

Last month, I wrote Part I of an article What Every Screenwriter Can Learn from Alfred HitchcockHitchcock was such a true master of cinema and had such brilliant perspective on the medium, quotes from him warrant another post at the very least. One of the great lessons from Hitchcock is that PRIMARY ACTION ALWAYS RECEIVES SECONDARY FOCUS. Genius! This insight is worth repeating: PRIMARY ACTION ALWAYS RECEIVES SECONDARY FOCUS. What does this mean exactly? In Psycho, when Janet Leigh is being stabbed in the shower, Hitchcock continually cuts away from the PRIMARY action, i.e. the heroine. He only gives us intermittent glimpses of her terror. The real terror comes from cutting away to the shower head, a glimpse of the knife, blood swirling down the drain. By cutting away from the PRIMARY action, Hitchcock leaves it up to our minds to fill in the blanks and IMAGINE her terror.

Psycho shower When a writer or director feeds you the literal image, it may have shock value and be a horrible image that stays in your mind and may create an adrenaline rush – but nothing is quite commensurate with our own capacity for imagination. This is where the real tension and suspense lie. Many writers are afraid of these quiet, unspoken moments. We see examples of these fears when writers feel compelled to write everything a character is thinking in dialogue, also known as exposition. Very often, less is more.

The experience of overwriting can be analogous with going on a date and being afraid to have quiet moments. You know those moments when you or your date wind up talking just to fill in the space.  You know what you’re doing…it feels fake and uncomfortable. The same can be detected by your potential buyer when they’re reading your script and you take up space, writing simply to fill a void rather than trust the quiet, truthful, unspoken moments.

An image, a look, the fear to say something can be a truer representation of the human experience. Real relationships can handle quiet moments. So too, your reader and audience can handle and welcome unspoken tensions. Don’t be afraid to let your reader fill in the blanks.

Another example that illustrates Hitchcock’s philosophy of PRIMARY ACTION receiving SECONDARY FOCUS occurs in several pivotal scenes in The Birds. When Tippy Hedron is at the gas station and gas begins to leak, Hitchcock continues to cut away from the PRIMARY action. Instead of focusing on the gas spreading, he cuts to someone striking a match, then back to Tippy Hedron looking through the window, then back to the gas spreading — all the while building excruciating tension as to how and when the match and the pool of gas will intersect. He doesn’t hand us the disaster. Instead, we anticipate it with fear and dread.

Birds.a few

In another famous scene from The Birds, Hitchcock shows us a few birds on a wire. He then cuts away from that PRIMARY action to other scenes. In the other scenes, we carry with us the image of the birds and with that, anticipation and tension. The next time we see the birds on the wire, the number has multiplied! Again, he cuts away from them. Then when we come back to the wire again, the number of birds has increased tenfold!

Last month, I mentioned Hitchcock’s quote “Drama is real life with the boring bits cut out.” The boring way to tell stories and shoot movies (unless the filmmaker or screenwriter wishes to make a deliberate point) would be to shoot the scene of birds accumulating on the wire in real time, or in just one scene. Had Hitchcock written and directed his films in such a prosaic manner, his films would have been cheesy and not enduring works that companies and filmmakers continue to copy, emulate and re-make. birds.lots lots How some of these examples apply to your own writing?  Don’t feel compelled to spoon-feed your audience every thought and emotion.  While it’s important to create clarity, don’t be afraid to also leave things to the imagination rather than spell everything out.  And don’t be afraid to break up your scenes. Interesting juxtapositions can build tension and create much richer, more dynamic and complex screenplays.

*****

3 thoughts on “Wendy’s LA4HIRE: What Every Screenwriter Can Learn From Alfred Hitchcock – Part II

  1. Leona Heraty

    Wendy, thanks for the excellent article!

    I love The Birds, it’s truly a scary movie , it scared me to death as a kid and it still scares me to this day, just like Psycho. You’re right, Hitchcock left a lot to our imagination, and that’s why his movies stand the test of time. It’s what he didn’t show us that made it scary, and he let our mind/imagination fill in the rest.

    I loved the various scenes that you mentioned, where there are a few birds on the wires, then more birds flock to the wires, and then tons of birds flock to the wires and practically darken the sky. All of those scenes, where the birds are flocking to the wires, are silent and eerie, which makes them even more ominous.

    Also, we never really know in the end why they flocked to that area, and why they attacked the townspeople. Was it because they were mad that Melanie brought Mitch’s sister, Cathy, the love birds, who were in a bird cage? Or was it because of atomic radiation, since this movie was made during days of the space race/atomic age? Or was it something else entirely? He leaves us to draw our own conclusions, which is really neat too. He didn’t spoon feed us and tell us why everything happened the way it did…it just happened and that’s all we need to know.

    Another scene that really scared me was when Melanie goes up into the attic and all the while, we’re saying to ourselves, “For Pete’s sake DON’T go up there!” But, she continues up the stairs and slowly opens the attic door and there’s a pause for a second when her eyes open wide… and we don’t see what she sees…once again, Hitchcock leaves it to our imagination. Then she’s inside the attic and the birds are viciously attacking her! Now that was a scary scene!

    So thanks for the 2 great articles about some of the great storytelling techniques we can learn from Hitchcock! As you know, there are so many wonderful details and angles, etc. etc. and neat techniques he used to make us want to watch his movies over and over again. Every time I watch a Hitchcock movie, I catch something I missed before, the details are wonderful and amazing. 🙂

  2. RajivPandit

    Hello, the shower sequence in PSYCHO was chock full of cuts of Marion Crane’s body recoiling in shock and terror. That kind of defeats a major premise of your argument that AH left much of the impact of the sequence up to the viewers’ imagination. And I think you misread most of the sequences in THE BIRDS. The primary action is what AH is focusing on in the gas station attack, and the cutaways, particularly to Melanie Daniels as she watches the chain of events leading to the explosion, distract rather than underscore the tension. Those cutaways to Melanie’s reaction are the epitome of cheesy.

  3. Pingback: Film Source Material – Part Three, SSN’s Industry Guide To The Digital Content NewFronts – Part One, TV Castings Report ‹ Studio System News

COMMENT